Support: Блоки.
Matériau: Известняк.
Description et état du monument : Лицевая сторона слабо обработана. Сохранились целиком.
The front is lightly worked. Fully preserved.
Lieu d'origine: Bakla
Lieu de découverte: Bakla.
Contexte local: Cruciform church, burial vault below the central area, south wall, 140-150cm above the floor.
Conditions de découverte: 1978, excavations of V.E. Rudakov.
Lieu de conservation: In situ
Institution de conservation: In situ
Autopsie: Non vidi
Observations: In situ
Fragment 1:
Fragment 2:
Champ épigraphique 1: Among other graffiti
Style écriture: Graffito; elongated angular letters
Champ épigraphique 2: Among other graffiti
Style écriture: See epigraphic field 1
Texte 1:
Type de texte :
Epitaph.
Datation du texte :1283 C.E.
Justificatif datation: указание_надписи
Datation du texte :
Justificatif datation: указание_надписи
Texte 2:
Type de texte :
Epitaph.
Datation du texte :1283 C.E.
Justificatif datation: указание_надписи
Datation du texte :
Justificatif datation: указание_надписи
Éditions: . ; . ;
Texte 1
01 ΔΟΥΛΟΙΤΘ |
01 Δοῦλοι τ(οῦ) θ(εοῦ ?) . |
Traduction :
Рабы Божьи (?).
Servants of God (?).
Commentaires :
Здесь отсутствуют имена усопших: возможно, они не были скопированы Рудаковым.
The names of the deceased are missing. Perhaps they were not transcribed by Rudakov.
Texte 2
01 ΣΨϞΒ̣ΜΝΒΡ[---] |
01 ςψϞβ̣ (?), μ(ηνὶ) Ν(οε)βρ(ίου ?) [---]. |
Traduction :
6792 (?), ...-го ноября (?).
year 6792 (?), ... of November
Commentaires :
Знаки, воспроизведенные на рисунке Рудакова (1980, 121–129, рис. 3) —
несомненно, буквы. Уровень исполнения их очень низкий, однако
можно угадать в них какой-то смысл.
В надписи явно присутствует пси, которое вкупе с соседними знаками кажется похожим на обозначение года, а следующие за ними ΜΝΒΡ — на “месяц ноябрь” (ср. V 2.3).
Указание на конец XIII в. в склепе, засыпанном, по Рудакову, при постройке позднего одноапсидного храма, не совсем согласуется с предположением первооткрывателя о разрушении крестообразного храма в XII в. — возможно, необходима перепроверка датировок Рудакова для вещей из комплекса первой церкви.
В надписи явно присутствует пси, которое вкупе с соседними знаками кажется похожим на обозначение года, а следующие за ними ΜΝΒΡ — на “месяц ноябрь” (ср. V 2.3).
Указание на конец XIII в. в склепе, засыпанном, по Рудакову, при постройке позднего одноапсидного храма, не совсем согласуется с предположением первооткрывателя о разрушении крестообразного храма в XII в. — возможно, необходима перепроверка датировок Рудакова для вещей из комплекса первой церкви.
Symbols represented on the drawing of Rudakov (1980, 121-129, fig. 3) are undoubtedly letters. Their execution is very poor, but we still can make
some sense of them.
There is a definite psi in this text, and together with the neighboring symbols, it might be a numeral, designating the year; ΜΝΒΡ that follows, might read "month of November" (cf. V 2.3).
A reference to XIIIth century in the burial vault, filled in, according to Rudakov, at the time of the construction of the single-apse church, does not fit in well with the discoverer's hypothesis of a XIIth-century date for the destruction of the cruciform church - it might be useful to re-examine the dates proposed by Rudakov for the finds from the complex of the first church.
There is a definite psi in this text, and together with the neighboring symbols, it might be a numeral, designating the year; ΜΝΒΡ that follows, might read "month of November" (cf. V 2.3).
A reference to XIIIth century in the burial vault, filled in, according to Rudakov, at the time of the construction of the single-apse church, does not fit in well with the discoverer's hypothesis of a XIIth-century date for the destruction of the cruciform church - it might be useful to re-examine the dates proposed by Rudakov for the finds from the complex of the first church.
Traduction : 1
Servants of God (?).
Traduction : 2
year 6792 (?), ... of November
Commentaires: 1
The names of the deceased are missing. Perhaps they were not transcribed by Rudakov.
Commentaires: 2
Symbols represented on the drawing of Rudakov (1980, 121-129, fig. 3) are undoubtedly letters. Their execution is very poor, but we still can make
some sense of them.
There is a definite psi in this text, and together with the neighboring symbols, it might be a numeral, designating the year; ΜΝΒΡ that follows, might read "month of November" (cf. V 2.3).
A reference to XIIIth century in the burial vault, filled in, according to Rudakov, at the time of the construction of the single-apse church, does not fit in well with the discoverer's hypothesis of a XIIth-century date for the destruction of the cruciform church - it might be useful to re-examine the dates proposed by Rudakov for the finds from the complex of the first church.
There is a definite psi in this text, and together with the neighboring symbols, it might be a numeral, designating the year; ΜΝΒΡ that follows, might read "month of November" (cf. V 2.3).
A reference to XIIIth century in the burial vault, filled in, according to Rudakov, at the time of the construction of the single-apse church, does not fit in well with the discoverer's hypothesis of a XIIth-century date for the destruction of the cruciform church - it might be useful to re-examine the dates proposed by Rudakov for the finds from the complex of the first church.
XML EpiDoc
URI:https://petrae.huma-num.fr/5.118
© A.Yu. Vinogradov, Irene Polinskaya